![]() |
| The king is in his all together - illustration from Hans Christian Andersen's tale of the Emperor's New Clothes. |
We all belong to many organisations in which a burning issue
is leadership. Dave Soleil in his blog
post refers to leadership as a community action rather than a person,
and Jill Janov wants us to think of leadership as a behaviour rather than a
role. Dave Soleil makes the point that we seem to have culturally
lost the concept that leadership is a collective effort, and suggests that "hierarchies
have become the organizational cast for the broken arm of community".
A lot of energy (and sleepless nights) is spent on how we retain or gain
positions of leadership power and control (or how many followers we have on Twitter)
Leadership programmes in my organization (Church of England)
have vision as one of their major preoccupations adding to the confusion which
has traditionally identified the visionary as the leader and thereby disqualified
and disempowered others. Such an understanding of leadership often leaves us
waiting on the leader because leadership is someone else’s responsibility.
Soleil suggests that “if we see the visionary … as one of many important pieces
of a community-based leadership movement, we empower everyone in the community
to contribute their “gifts” as a critical piece of the collective effort we
call leadership.”
Positional leadership is full of anxiety. “What if I am
found out?” “What if they see that I am wearing no clothes?” “What happens if
my followership and support collapses?” Visionary leaders become frightening
tyrants when their authority is lost – look at the leadership toppled in the
Arab Spring.
If leadership is best
seen as an interactive community behaviour, it also needs to be recognized that
leadership is often imposed to control that community behaviour and against the
wishes of communities. Without that interference though, people create the
leadership that best responds to their needs at the time. Leadership becomes
informal and flexible. For Janov, leaders “emerge from the group, not by
self-assertion, but because they make sense, given what the group and
individuals need so that they can survive and grow”. Wheatley suggests that we
look for order instead of control in our organizing and organizations:
“What if we stopped looking for control, and began, in earnest, to look for order? Order we will find in places we never thought to look before – all around us in nature’s living, dynamic systems. In fact, once we begin to look into nature with new eyes, the teachers are everywhere.” (Meg Wheatley, 1999, Leadership and the New Science, p25)
photo by LHG Creative
The flight of the flock of geese is one of nature’s teachers
when it comes to leadership programmes. I have never heard the translation of
the geese’s honks. The question they are asking is not “who is the leader?” but “who is leading next?” For them
leadership is a behaviour and community interaction. Leadership is not something
they leave to another bird. There isn’t a goose who can duck the responsibility
it shares with its whole community.
























![saint paul's [1]](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6160/6164379130_5278045f6c.jpg)
